| Tyler | Inner Guard | Tracing Board | Middle Chamber | Holy Spirit Watch | Seek | 3° Tour | Keystone Kraft Koncepts | |
| Recently Initiated | Video and Audio Files | In Focus | The Morgan Report | F.·.W.·. Magazine | Mailroom | |
| Breaking Masonry News | Discussion Forum | Message Board | Blog | Guestbook | Books | Links | |
| Pillars of the Community | Travelling Men | Ancient Landmarks | Memory Work | |
| Anti-Masonry: Points of View | Craftyness | A Certain Point Within A Circle | |
|
FreePress-FreeSpeech Banner |



|
Police ignore freemason survey
Jamie
Wilson Guardian Saturday July 29, 2000
Police officers may be
required to reveal whether they are freemasons after almost two-thirds
refused to cooperate with an official study of membership of the secretive
society, the government announced yesterday.
Ministers had hoped that a request for voluntary declaration of
membership would allay public anxiety about the existence of masonic
networks in the criminal justice system. But the proportion of officers in
England and Wales responding to the survey amounted to only 36%, compared
with 96% of judges and 87% of magistrates.
Jack Straw, the home secretary, said that he would consult police
representatives to see how to obtain a "satisfactory" response from
officers.
Responding to a critical home affairs select committee report published
yesterday, Mr Straw said that the judiciary and magistrates had
demonstrated that registration could be adequately achieved "on a
voluntary basis and without legislation".
"However, this has not so far been the case in police forces," said Mr
Straw's statement, "and the Home Office will therefore be consulting the
police service about how to achieve a satisfactory response rate, whether
through changing the way in which voluntary registration is conducted, or
through legislating to require registration."
Mr Straw acknowledged the committee's conclusion that there was "a
widespread public perception" that freemasonry could have an unhealthy
influence on the courts.
"The government is committed to ensuring public confidence in their
police service," he said.
"It is important that the police service now work with us to develop
arrangements which will deliver this confidence."
The Home Office said that among judges, 5% declared they were masons;
89% declared non-membership; and 1% declined to say. Among magistrates, 5%
declared as masons, 80% non-masons, and 2% refused to say.
The voluntary system was operated by 32 of the 43 police forces in
England and Wales. Of the 36% of police and civil ian support staff who
did respond, 1% declared as masons; 89% declared non-membership; and 9%
refused to say.
Sussex chief constable Paul Whitehouse, spokesman of the Association of
Chief Police Officers, said that the association welcomed further
consultation with the government on the issue of registration of
freemasonry.
John Hamill, director of communications at the United Grand Lodge of
England, said that freemasons would oppose any move to force police
officers to declare membership. "We see that as singling out freemasons
for discrimination based on a false perception," he said.
The consultation will seek responses by the end of December.
| |
|
| ||||

