| Tyler | Inner Guard | Tracing Board | Middle Chamber | Holy Spirit Watch | Seek | 3 Tour | Keystone Kraft Koncepts |

| Recently Initiated | Video and Audio Files | In Focus | The Morgan Report | F..W.. Magazine | Mailroom |

| Breaking Masonry News | Discussion Forum | Message Board | Blog | Guestbook | Books | Links |

| Pillars of the Community | Travelling Men | Ancient Landmarks | Memory Work |

| Anti-Masonry: Points of View | Craftyness | A Certain Point Within A Circle |

| Born in Blood | Catechisms of the Made Men | Fellowship |





FreePress-FreeSpeech Banner




freemasons, freemason, freemasonry




Freemasonry Watch




Freemasonry Is Religion Under RLUIPA, But Masonic Temple Loses RLUIPA Claim




g and compass




Religion Clause
http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2007/10/freemasonry-is-religion-under-rluipa.html

Freemasonry Is "Religion" Under RLUIPA, But Masonic Temple Loses RLUIPA Claim

Monday, October 08, 2007

Posted by Howard Friedman --PermaLink: 6:38 AM

In Scottish Rite Cathedral Association of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles, (CA Ct. App., Oct. 3, 2007), a California court of appeals rejected a RLUIPA challenge by the Los Angeles Scottish Rite Cathedral Association to the revocation of its certificate of occupancy for its Masonic Temple. The appellate court rejected the trial court's holding that Freemasonry is not a religion. The appellate court found "no principled way to distinguish the earnest pursuit of these [Masonic] principles ... from more widely acknowledged modes of religious exercise." However the court held that the Masonic Temple, which was now largely being rented out for commercial as well as non-profit events, was not protected under RLUIPA. It concluded: "a burden on a commercial enterprise used to fund a religious organization does not constitute a substantial burden on 'religious exercise' within the meaning of RLUIPA."

2 comments:
Jason Cosminsky said...
Well, the appellate court is clearly in error and has ignored over 300 years of precedent regarding this organization. About what one would expect out of a California Banana Court.

Mon Oct 08, 07:56:00 AM EDT
Anonymous said...
Indeed it is in error. If you look at just about any Masonic website, you will find a statement to the effect that "Freemasonry is NOT a religion." Thus, by the orgainizations own self-identification, its buildings should not fall under RLUIPA. It is that simple.

Sat Dec 08, 10:08:00 AM EST
Post a Comment


Links To This Post
As if with an Occult Hand...









Travel to the F..W.. Middle Chamber






powered by FreeFind


Our MasonStoppers Line
Send us in confidence details of cases where you think
Organized Freemasonry has personally hurt yourself,
family, friends, aquaintances, or community. We would
also appreciate any additional background information,
links, and references on Freemasonry and the Occult.
Help us take a bite out of Freemasonry.




13,361,778 (13/02/07)
FastCounter by bCentral

Date Of Raising
June 24, 6000 A.L.

Save this site. Mirror it, if it goes 404.

X Network Banner ExchangeX Network Banner Exchange