<\/h1>\n\n\n\n
By Jonas E. Alexis<\/a> on March 16, 2014<\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Aleister Crowley on the cover of the Beatles\u2019 Sergeant Pepper\u2019s Lonely Hearts Club Ban<\/p>\n\n\n\n As we have seen, any categorical and metaphysical denial of the moral order will inexorably lead to radical deceptions and sometimes covert operations.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Freemasonry, as a secret society and judaizing movement, is not only part of those deceptions but is congruent with Jewish magic and mysticism.[1]<\/a> Only those in the upper echelon actually know what is exactly going on. As Jones documents,<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe deeper the adept penetrates, the more Talmudic are the mysteries revealed to him. The Rosicrusian, for example, is taught the inscription INRI which was nailed to the Cross means not Iesus Nazarensis Rex Iudeorum, but rather the \u2018Iew of Nazareth Led into Iudea,\u2019 a reading which deprives Christ of his divinity and reasserts the Talmudic calumny that Christ was a common criminal who deserved to be executed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201c\u2018As soon as the candidate has proved that he understands the Masonic meaning of this inscription INRI, the Master exclaims, My dear Brethren, the word is found again, and all present applaud this luminous discovery, that\u2014He whose death was the consummation and the grand mystery of the Christian Religion was no more than a common Jew crucified for his crimes.\u2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cTo be initiated into the higher degrees of Freemasonry, the adept must agree to become an assassin of the assassin of Adoniram. He must be willing to assassinate Christ and his representatives on earth.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe revolutionary intent of Freemasonry becomes clear when the adept is informed that he must be willing to kill the king. Mystical Masonry is synonymous with Revolution. \u201d<\/strong>[2]<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Quoting Barruel, Jones writes,<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWhen the adept sallies forth from the cavern with the reeking head, he cries Nekom (I have killed him)\u2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe adept is informed that till now he has only been partially admitted to the truth; that Equality and Liberty, which had constituted the first secret on his admission into Masonry, consisted in recognizing no superior on earth, and in viewing Kings and Pontiffs in another light than as men on a level with their fellow men, having no rights to sit on the throne, or to serve at the altar, but what the people had granted them.\u201d[3]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Kinsey and Kenneth Anger at Crowley\u2019s Abbey of Thelema<\/p>\n\n\n\n What a coincidence that Aleister Crowley, a 33rd<\/sup> degree mason who ended up having a master effect on pop music, who held \u201cgroup orgies\u201d as part of his regular rituals (including small children), and who ended up influencing sex perverts such as Alfred Kinsey,[4]<\/a> also performed similar rituals. During one particular ceremony, he blasphemed Christ and intoned his own malediction:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cLo, Jesus of Nazareth, how thou art taken in my snare. All my life long thou hast plagued me and affronted me. In thy name\u2014with all other free souls in Christendom\u2014I have been tortured in my boyhood; all delights have been forbidden unto me, and that which is owed to me they pay not\u2014in thy name.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cNow at last I have thee\u2026the Slave-God is in the power of the Lord of Freedoom\u2026Give thou place to me, O Jesus; thine eon is passed; the Age of Horus is arisen by the Master the Great Beast that is a man\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cI To Mega Therion therefore condemn thee Jesus the Slave-God to be mocked and spat upon and scourged and then crucified.\u201d[5]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Some scholars would point out that \u201cRosicrucianism played an important role in the formation of Freemasonry.\u201d[6]<\/a> If that is the case, then we have another piece of evidence on our hands which clearly indicates that a marriage between Freemasonry and Rosicrucianism is almost unavoidable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Denis Diderot<\/p>\n\n\n\n Both Freemasonry and Rosicrucianism, at their eventual root, sought to denigrate and attack Christ and this was very important during the French Revolution. Since that was the case, again the marriage between the French Revolution and Jewish movements were two sides of the same coin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Isaac M. Wise wrote in 1866 that \u201cMasonry is a Jewish institution, whose history, degrees, charges, passwords and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end.\u201d[7]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n There are some scholars on the other end of the spectrum who would argue that Freemasonry played little or no part in the French Revolution, despite the fact that it was widespread and was embraced by the philosophes<\/em>. R. R. Palmer somewhat ascribes to that position. He writes,<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe Masonic lodges provided a kind of international network of like-minded people. Their existence facilitated the circulation of ideas. But the lodges took no orders from any headquarters, their members never acted as a group, and their very taste for elaborate mystification made them innocuous if not ridiculous in real political life.\u201d[8]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n The French Revolution, as we have seen, belies this claim. To reemphasize, the Encyclopedists were almost exclusively Freemasons and had one abiding principle: to attack the moral order in all its areas and to replace it with their own agenda, which they called \u201cReason.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Encyclopedists really wanted to cross the sexual Rubicon. For example, Diderot\u2019s 1748 novel Les Bijous Indiscrets<\/em> was \u201cmidly pornographic\u2026\u201d[9]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, if the \u201cMasonic lodges provided a kind of international network,\u201d and the Encyclopedists were intellectually and politically agitating the masses and anyone who would listen to take actions in the Revolution, it is irrational and irresponsible to say that Freemasonry played little role in political life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Isaac M. Wise<\/p>\n\n\n\n Jewish historian Margaret C. Jacob ascribes to a somewhat more irresponsible view of the Masonic lodges. She writes that the lodges did not seek to create revolution, but<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201csought to inculcate civic virtue. They placed a great emphasis on living by laws and constitutions, on voting and oratory, and on charitable works.\u201d[10]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n There were indeed some Catholics who were members of the Masonic lodges, and there are even some sodomites who have crept in over the years,[11]<\/a> thanks to the sexual undercover work of Wilhelm Reich.[12]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n But the Catholic Church in general has always opposed Freemasonry from its inception largely because they view it as a dark, secret, and anti-Christian activity, which only a select few are allowed to know.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In 1738, the Pope condemned Freemasonry because it was perceived to be not only anti-Christian but subversive.[13]<\/a> Of course Freemasonry does mention a form of \u201cbrotherhood\u201d for the initiates, but the higher one goes, the more things change and the more he learns about the ideas that lurk beneath the surface.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Jacob can see that Freemasonry played at least some role in the French Revolution, but she still cannot explain the fact that the revolutionaries were almost all Freemasons. To cite again philo-Semitic historian Will Durant, the Masonic lodge<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cserved as a refuge for deists and as a center of political intrigue; it became a channel of English influence, and prepared the way for the philosophers.\u201d[14]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n If Masonic lodges \u201cprovided members with an opportunity to orate, to vote, to pay dues, and to abide by rules and constitutions,\u201d[15]<\/a> why did hundreds of Catholic priests who did not agree with the Masonic revolution have to die?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why did \u201cexecutions\u201d actually \u201cbecome a daily ritual, producing a Reign of Terror\u201d which left more than thirty thousand people dead between 1793 and 1794?[16]<\/a> Scholar Michael Allen Gillespie writes,<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cthe Reign of Terror had an extraordinary impact on the intellectual elite of its time, shattering their faith that reason could rule the world, that progress was inevitable, and that the spread of enlightenment would usher in an age of peace, prosperity, and human freedom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe Terror convinced them that when universal reason came to power it wore a devil\u2019s mask and opened up the gates not of heaven but of hell.\u201d[17]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n I would slightly disagree with Gillespie here. The Reign of Terror was not based on reason but on essentially Masonic principles, which ended up using universal reason as a pretension.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As we have already seen, the philosophes<\/em> who were committed to the Enlightenment project were overwhelmingly freemasons\u2014and Voltaire was no exception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After he was initiated into the Nine Sisters Lodge of the Freemasons<\/strong>, the chairman of the lodge made a speech with respect to Voltaire\u2019s initiation, saying,<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWe swear to help our brothers, but you have been the founder of an entire colony which adores you and which overflows with your benefactions\u2026You, much beloved brother, have been a Freemason before you received the degree\u2026and you have fulfilled the obligations of a Freemason before you promised to keep them.\u201d[18]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n In other words, according to the chairman, Voltaire\u2019s revolutionary ideology was consistent with Freemasonry even when Voltaire was not aware of it. In fact, Voltaire constantly received positive accolades from the Lodge.[19]<\/a> Why?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Because Voltaire, according to Will Durant\u2019s own assessment, was weakening the Church\u2019s political power.[20]<\/a> And this was fully congruent with the Masonic lodge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some, like Jacques-Rene Hebert, \u201cfollowed Voltairean rationalism, encouraged the desecration of churches, and set up the public worship of the Goddess of Reason\u201d by 1793.[21]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n Eric Hobsbawn can talk about a \u201cfairly coherent social group\u201d that gave the French Revolution \u201ceffective unity,\u201d including Freemasonry,[22]<\/a> and moves on to say, \u201cIf there was a flourishing religion among the eighteenth century elite, it was rationalist, illuminist and anti-clerical Freemasonry.\u201d[23]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n According to this premise, it simply does not make sense to say that Freemasonry had no effect on the French Revolution. In the end, Jacob had to admit that Freemasonry had some role in the revolution:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cUnquestionably, the Masonic lodges and prominent Freemasons did play a political role in the revolution, but it would be na\u00efve to imagine that they conspired to bring it about. History simply does not work that way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cYet\u2026it would be na\u00efve to imagine that Masonic lodges\u2026possess no discernible political ideology and interest.\u201d[24]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n If they did not conspire to bring it about, who was the culprit? Or does Jacob try to tell us that the revolution happened by itself?<\/p>\n\n\n\n When the French Revolution broke out, the Masonic Encyclopedists who presumably preached \u201cReason\u201d and Liberte, L\u2019egalite, and Fraternite <\/em>had to persecute the Catholics who opposed the Revolution in the first place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This \u201cfraternity,\u201d as it turned out, was only all-inclusive so long that one did not stand in opposition to the fraternity. Barruel had to flee to London in order to save his skin.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n About 8,000 to 10,000 Catholics also had to take refuge in Protestant England. Both Edmund Burke and King George III made great efforts to rescue Catholics in France during that period<\/strong>.[25]<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Jacob treats Barruel\u2019s work as \u201cparanoia,\u201d but cannot help to use it as a way to \u201capproach\u201d the study of \u201cEuropean history.\u201d[26]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Freemasonry<\/strong> seems to have lain dormant after the French Revolution among intellectual revolutionaries, but it got its reprisal in the twentieth century\u2014this time during World War II. One individual who was doing research on this very subject was noted French historian Bernard Fay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fay was educated at Harvard, became a professor of history at College de France, and eventually became the general administrator of the Bibliotheque Nationale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fay began to search the archives in order to give a detailed account of Freemasonry and how it was largely the backdrop of the French Revolution. Not only that, Fay saw that Freemasonry was having a come-back in his own time. Fay was what one might call an \u201carchivist,\u201d that is, he believed in documented evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fay\u2019s account here is taken from Barbara Will. Building her argument from Jacques Derrida\u2019s premise, Will faults Fay for what Derrida called \u201carchive fever.\u201d[27]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Summoning Derrida to build her case proves to be detrimental to Will\u2019s cause, because Derrida did not believe in objective truth. For Derrida, archives can never lead to truth\u2014on the contrary, archives \u201cwork against stable or positivistic knowledge or historical meaning.\u201d[28]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe archive,\u201d Derrida tells us, \u201calways works\u2026against itself.\u201d[29]<\/a> If they always do, then why do we have them? Well, for Derrida, archivists are compulsively \u201csick\u201d because they seek knowledge in archives.[30]<\/a> Once again following Derrida\u2019s premise, Will writes,<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cAnd as someone who staked his entire career on archival knowledge, Bernard Fay also succumbed to the fever that would work against this knowledge, leading his career down ever more paranoid and delusional paths.\u201d[31]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Bernard Fay<\/p>\n\n\n\n The only way that Derrida could come up with these ridiculous ideas was because he was following the ideological tenets of postmodernism, which is Jewish in its intellectual orientation. As such, he had to dismiss any document that might lead one closer to the truth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As Jones puts it, \u201cPolitical correctness was the final expression of the Talmudic redefinition of American discourse which had begun in the \u201870s under the direction of Jewish critical theories like [Stanley] Fish and Derrida.\u201d[32]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n After Derrida delivered a lecture at Johns Hopkins University on deconstructionism, postmodernism began to take shape not only in academia but in culture as well. Lawrence D. Kritzman, Brian J. Reilly, and Malcolm DeBevoise tell us,<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWith this paper [La structure, le signe, et le jeus dans le discourse des sciences humaines<\/em>] the incipient movement was effectively launched: for the first time the elements of the poststructuralist program were laid out as part of an inquiry that was utterly different from the one that had prevailed under the name of structuralism in the strict sense.\u201d[33]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Derrida was a revolutionary, and he made no apology when he wrote:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIt is true that my interest in literature, diaries, journals in general, also signified a typical, stereotypical revolt against the family.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cMy passion for Nietzsche, Rousseau, and also Gide, whom I read a lot at that time, meant among other things: \u2018Families, I hate you.\u2019 I thought of literature as the end of the family, and of the society it represented, even if that family was also, on the other hand, persecuted.\u201d<\/strong>[<\/strong>34]<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n Literature, then, was for Derrida a weapon with which he could attack ultimate truth. He put it quite bluntly:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIf the philosophical question seemed at least as necessary to me, this is perhaps because I had a presentiment that there could be sometimes an innocence or irresponsibility, or even an impotence, in literature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cNot only can one say everything in literature without there being any consequences, I thought, no doubt naively, but at bottom the writer as such does not ask the question of the essence of literature.\u201d[35]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n If postmodernism\/relativism is true, then there is no need for historical scholarship, for any \u201ctext\u201d is relative to all other \u201ctexts,\u201d though they may pronounce completely contradictory statements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Furthermore, since no ultimate truth exists in the end, one statement is as valid as another. Consistent with this frame of mind is the idea that there is no need to sift fact from fiction, truth from error; astronomy is no better than astrology, chemistry is no better than alchemy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Will would have made a much more historically rigorous point had she not relied on Derrida\u2019s self-defeating philosophy to draw some of her conclusions. As Professor R. V. Young of North Carolina State University put it, \u201cRather than a frontal assault on metaphysics, Derrida proposes subversion from within.\u201d[36]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Sarah Hammerschlag<\/p>\n\n\n\n Similarly, late French philosopher Maurice Blanchot implicitly argued that Derrida\u2019s Deconstructionism is rabbinic in its ideological orientation. This led scholar Sarah Hammerschlag to say, \u201cThis rabbinic reading could be intended to remind Derrida that he may be closer to Judaism that he would expect.\u201d[37]<\/a> Hammerschlag moves on to declare that<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cJudaism, as it signifies in modernity, develops a particular political and ethical importance in his thought: it appears as one of the key sites through which he highlights his concerns with the problems of negotiating between political\/philosophical claims to universality and structures of exclusivity\u2026being Jewish becomes the very site at which the very possibility of such an opposition can be deconstructed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cMoreover, he sees being Jewish as the key site and the source for deconstruction itself: \u2018Being-Jewish would be more than and the other than the simple strategic or methodological lever of a general deconstruction, it would be the experience of deconstruction itself, its chance, its menace, its destiny, its earthquake.\u201d[38]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Wills writes that Fay began to cooperate with Nazi German<\/strong>y, which eventually took the lives of hundreds of Freemasons. Yet whenever Fay declares something that seems to contradict her thesis, she doesn\u2019t believe him. She writes,<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cFay would later claim that he hid the volume [archival documents about freemasonry] from Nazi seizure; at his trial, he even brought forward evidence from a French Freemason thanking Fay for having \u2018done excellent work\u2019 in saving Masonic archives from the occupying forces.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yet even then, Will declares that \u201cit is also interesting to speculate about other motives driving Fay\u2014this historian of Freemasonry turned ideologue and inquisitor\u2014to hoard Masonic archives in his private home.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n In order to make this point, Will admits that she had to step \u201coutside of history for a moment.\u201d[39]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n It is conceivable that Nazi Germany would persecute Freemasons, for Hitler himself was anti-mason.[40]<\/a> Propaganda against Freemasonry was quite rampant in the Third Reich.[41]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Put simply, both Derrida and Will are not interested in archival documents, even though Will quotes some archival documents in her book (only to prove her points), which make the story even more ambiguous. According to Will\u2019s account,<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cAccording to information presented at Fay\u2019s 1946 trial, six thousand Freemasons were directly questioned or placed under surveillance over the course of the war, 989 were deported to concentration camps, and 549 were killed, either by firing squad or through deportation.\u201d[42]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n She admits, however, \u201cNo document exists that directly links Fay to these deportations or killings; whatever involvement he had in the system that facilitated these actions was steps removed from their terrible final outcome.\u201d[43]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Some would tend to lean toward the view that Fay was an anti-Semite, but Will again writes,<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cFay had enough Jewish friends before and during the war\u2014including, of course, Gertrude Stein\u2026The list of Fay\u2019s Jewish supporters at his trial reinforces this claim, as do attestations by even the most critical of his colleagues. One Jewish friend, Denise Aime Azam, was vocal enough in her support of Fay to call him her protector during the war.\u201d<\/strong>[44]<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n Will agrees that Fay was not an anti-Semite.[45]<\/a> But Will seems to find it puzzling that Masonic members around that time were largely Jews, and Fay was radically anti-Masonic.[46]<\/a> As a result, Will declares,<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cBeyond a few chosen exceptions, the Jews and their unhappy fate mattered little to Bernard Fay. They were casualties of the \u2018cleaning-up operations\u2019 required to purge France of a century and a half of democratic decadence.\u201d[47]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Winston Churchill<\/p>\n\n\n\n The French Revolution<\/strong> and its bloody aftermath clearly indicated that Winston Churchill\u2019s bold declaration was more plausible than he ever imagined, that the West ultimately faces two opposite but powerful worldviews: the divine and the diabolical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The diabolical worldview is based on the rejection of the divine plan, and both are at war with each other. This ideological and cosmic war, which historically began at the foot of the cross, will continue until the end of history, and we just happened to be in middle of this war.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Moreover, the diabolical worldview has a long list of devoted disciples. As Churchill himself put it,<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cFrom the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIt played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.\u201d[48]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Churchill also said that<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cOf all the tyrannies in history, the Bolshevist tyranny is the worst, the most destructive, and most degrading. Bolshevism is not a policy, it is a disease\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cCivilization is being completely extinguished over gigantic areas while Bolsheviks hop and caper like troops of ferocious baboons amid the ruins of cities and the corpses of their victims.\u201d<\/strong>[49]<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Katy Perry\u2019s Dark Horse<\/p>\n\n\n\n At the metaphysical and categorical level, it is either the implications of Logos or Talmudic\/diabolic thought that will eventually dominate the West.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We are seeing this in pop music as well, where the principles that make up the Illuminati and Freemasonry have already been embraced by people like Jimmy Page, late Jim Morrison of the Doors, David Bowie, Sting, Daryl Hall, Marilyn Manson, Prince, late Michael Jackson, Jay Z, Kanye West<\/a>, etc. New Masonic puppets like Beyonce, Katy Perry, and Rihanna are no exceptions.[50]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n In the political realm, the subversion of the West has been going on in a subliminal way. For example, neo-Bolsheviks subvert America and in the process America, through Wall Street bankers and the CIA, began to subvert other countries and even America with drugs, torture<\/a>, and other destructive means.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Countries such as Guatemala, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan<\/a> were and perhaps still are, in the words of Peter Dale Scott of the University of California, \u201cCIA clients.\u201d[51]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Dieudonne<\/p>\n\n\n\n Talmudic\/Zionist\/neo-Bolshevik thought represents the end of the West and every reasonable person must stand in opposition to its political and historical ideology precisely because it leads to bondage, double standard, and, in one word: chaos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This has created a stir in countries such as France and Jewish journalist Alissa J. Rubin of the New York Times<\/em> has lamented that despite the fact that the Zionist establishment has isolated people like Dieudonne, the anti-Zionist movement is garnering millions of support across the globe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Rubin, who struggled mightily to string two rational thoughts together in her article, accused Dieudonne of \u201cinventing an inverted Nazi salute known as the quenelle to satirize the French elite,\u201d[52]<\/a> but Rubin cannot explain the fact that at this current moment, the Zionist establishment has allied with Fascists and neo-Nazis to destroy Russian forces in Ukraine.[53]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Once again the current situation in Ukraine is a classic example of how Jewish revolutionary movements seek to subvert the West. Journalist Patrick L. Smith rightly declared that<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cYou need a machete these days to whack through the thicket of misinformation, disinformation, spin, propaganda and straight-out lying that daily envelopes the Ukraine crisis like kudzu on an Alabama telephone pole. But an outline of an outcome is now faintly discernible.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n It should not be a surprise that \u201cA new poll suggests Americans have very little appetite for any real involvement in the crisis in Ukraine.\u201d[54]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Charles Krauthammer<\/p>\n\n\n\n But, according to a new order from Washington entitled \u201cBlocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine<\/a>,\u201d we learn that the government can seize the assets of \u201cany United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States\u201d if he\/she dares to criticize our government\u2019s involvement in Ukraine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n How could that happen in America? Well, the neo-Bolsheviks such as Max Boot and Michael Austin have wasted no time in screaming their lungs out for more conflict with Russia.[55]<\/a> Tom Rogan, a neocon mush-head, has declared without any serious thought<\/a> that<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWe have to do what we should have done at first: Provide troops to guarantee Ukraine\u2019s sovereignty.\u201d[56]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n For neo-Bolshevik Charles Krauthammer, the United States ought to stop Russia in the following ways (and don\u2019t forget, the American taxpayers will provide the funds):<\/p>\n\n\n\n It looks like Washington was paying attention to Krauthammer, as they are beginning to wage a frontal attack against Russia. Did you know that a cyber weapon has already infected computer networks in Ukraine?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Did you know that the Financial Times<\/em> itself compared the act with Stuxnet, the malware that was developed by the Zionists in Israel and America which eventually bugged Iran\u2019s computers?[58]<\/a> This program<\/p>\n\n\n \u201ccould shut off civilian power or water supplies, cripple banks or even blow up industrial sites that depend on computer-controlled safety programmes. The malware has infected networks run by the Kiev government and systemically important organisations. Lithuanian systems have also been disproportionately hit by it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cOuroboros has been in development for nearly a decade and is too sophisticated to have been programmed by an individual or a non-state organisation, according to the applied intelligence unit at BAE Systems, which was the first to identify and analyse the malware.\u201d[59]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n We know for certain that Stuxnet was created by the U.S. and Israeli governments, and it took millions of dollars to get it going.[60]<\/a> Moreover, we know that Russia or Iran did not attack Ukraine using malwares. So who is the culprit? You be the judge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Did you know that U.S. assistant secretary of state for European and Asian Affairs was handing out pastries to anti-government protesters in Kiev?[61]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Did you know that Israel has also been involved in the situation in Ukraine?[62]<\/a> Did you know that hundreds of American soldiers have already been patrolling Kiev?<\/a> Did you know that the U.S. sent its warship Destroyer to the Black Sea?<\/a> Yet, as Israel Shamir points out, it is Russia that is the invader, not the U.S.!<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n How would you feel if a representative of North Korea or China or Russia or Iran or Japan starts passing out pastries to anti-government protesters in Washington? Would not the government go up in flame and perhaps declare war against that country?<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Sarah Harrison<\/p>\n\n\n\n Churchill<\/strong> again noted in 1920 that \u201cthe most passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people\u201d by the Bolsheviks. We are currently repeating history.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The people who wanted to overthrow the political order in Russia in 1917 have been dead for a long time, but their ideological grandchildren want to finish the job they had started.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Twentieth-century neoconservatism is in many ways a series of unfortunate events which inexorably lead to the ideological foundation of the French Revolution and then Bolshevism: blood, torture and murder (including sexual murder and sodomy<\/a>) in the metaphysical and practical sense.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Because of the neoconservative ideology, at least 360,000 U.S. veterans probably have brain injuries.[63]<\/a> All of those horrors have happened in the name of \u201cdemocracy.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n But if anyone challenges that form of \u201cdemocracy,\u201d he or she is to be labeled a threat and sometimes even a terrorist. Sarah Harrison of the Guardian<\/em> for example cannot even return to England (the land of her birth) because she used to work with Edward Snowden and Julian Assange.[64]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n In that sense, neoconservatism and the Masonic ideology of the French revolution converge in a subtle way, since both worldviews end up producing the same fruit and since both worldviews were being manipulated by people of identical ideologies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bolshevism was just an updated version of the subversive ideology which Jewish revolutionaries were spreading across the Soviet Union. And neoconservatism is another \u201cclean\u201d version of Bolshevism. The grandchildren of the Bolshevik revolution have been proposing the most passions of revenge in the belly of the Russian people at this present time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Those grandchildren can deliver their neo-Bolshevik message through the entire media outlets (most specifically in the Washington Post<\/em>, the New York Times<\/em>, TV chat shows, etc) almost simultaneously. Paul Wolfowitz for example used the Washington Post to say that the U.S. should arm the Syrian rebels\/jihadists<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/freemasonrywatch.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/freemasonrywatch.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-1.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/freemasonrywatch.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-2.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/freemasonrywatch.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/image-3.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"bijous\"](\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20170330012941im_\/http:\/\/www.veteranstoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/bijous-193x320.jpg\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n![\"palmer\"](\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20170330012941im_\/http:\/\/www.veteranstoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/palmer-202x320.jpg\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n![\"collaboration\"](\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20170330012941im_\/http:\/\/www.veteranstoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/collaboration-212x320.jpg\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
![\"derrida](\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20170330012941im_\/http:\/\/www.veteranstoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/derrida-1-213x320.jpg\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n![\"Churchill\"](\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20170330012941im_\/http:\/\/www.veteranstoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/Churchill-320x166.jpg\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n
![\"stuxtnet\"](\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20170330012941im_\/http:\/\/www.veteranstoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/stuxtnet1-320x198.jpg\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
![<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\nSarah Harrison<\/p>\n\n\n\nChurchill<\/strong> again noted in 1920 that \u201cthe most passions of revenge have been excited in the breasts of the Russian people\u201d by the Bolsheviks. We are currently repeating history.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe people who wanted to overthrow the political order in Russia in 1917 have been dead for a long time, but their ideological grandchildren want to finish the job they had started.<\/p>\n\n\n\nTwentieth-century neoconservatism is in many ways a series of unfortunate events which inexorably lead to the ideological foundation of the French Revolution and then Bolshevism: blood, torture and murder (including sexual murder and sodomy<\/a>) in the metaphysical and practical sense.<\/p>\n\n\n\nBecause of the neoconservative ideology, at least 360,000 U.S. veterans probably have brain injuries.[63]<\/a> All of those horrors have happened in the name of \u201cdemocracy.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\nBut if anyone challenges that form of \u201cdemocracy,\u201d he or she is to be labeled a threat and sometimes even a terrorist. Sarah Harrison of the Guardian<\/em> for example cannot even return to England (the land of her birth) because she used to work with Edward Snowden and Julian Assange.[64]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\nIn that sense, neoconservatism and the Masonic ideology of the French revolution converge in a subtle way, since both worldviews end up producing the same fruit and since both worldviews were being manipulated by people of identical ideologies.<\/p>\n\n\n\nBolshevism was just an updated version of the subversive ideology which Jewish revolutionaries were spreading across the Soviet Union. And neoconservatism is another \u201cclean\u201d version of Bolshevism. The grandchildren of the Bolshevik revolution have been proposing the most passions of revenge in the belly of the Russian people at this present time.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThose grandchildren can deliver their neo-Bolshevik message through the entire media outlets (most specifically in the Washington Post<\/em>, the New York Times<\/em>, TV chat shows, etc) almost simultaneously. Paul Wolfowitz for example used the Washington Post to say that the U.S. should arm the Syrian rebels\/jihadists<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n](\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20170330012941\/http:\/\/www.veteranstoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/03\/Sarah-Harrison.jpg\"){kind=link}